<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does anyone consider songwriters to be theologians?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/933/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/933</link>
	<description>Positive Daily Commentary on Southern Gospel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:54:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amy Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/933/comment-page-1#comment-13492</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=933#comment-13492</guid>
		<description>Oops ... that was from memory.  Thanks!

Evidently I sometimes do like my dad and just make up something totally new that rhymes.  I wasn&#039;t sure that was right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops &#8230; that was from memory.  Thanks!</p>
<p>Evidently I sometimes do like my dad and just make up something totally new that rhymes.  I wasn&#8217;t sure that was right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Swain</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/933/comment-page-1#comment-13472</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Swain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=933#comment-13472</guid>
		<description>Amy: The lyrics to the last L5 song you mentioned are: &quot;“Unless a Lamb was led to the slaughter, and up on the altar the Sacrifice laid; unless He saved the sons and the daughters with blood that flowed from Him that day.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy: The lyrics to the last L5 song you mentioned are: &#8220;“Unless a Lamb was led to the slaughter, and up on the altar the Sacrifice laid; unless He saved the sons and the daughters with blood that flowed from Him that day.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/933/comment-page-1#comment-13470</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=933#comment-13470</guid>
		<description>Hmm... that&#039;s a very different question for me than for some of you.  I&#039;m Arminian in doctrine, and a majority (probably) of SG artists are Baptist/Calvinistic.  So I&#039;m used to putting up with doctrine that I don&#039;t exactly agree with. :)  (I&#039;m not Pentecostal either, so there goes the other 40%!)

I don&#039;t have any problem with songs like &quot;Mama&#039;s Teaching Angels...&quot; It&#039;s a pleasant imagination ... and who knows? :D  What about &quot;Serenaded by Angels&quot;?  No chapter and verse for that one, either.  And the line in the Kingsmen/Ronnie Hinson song about &quot;The angels spread their wings and stood prepared ...&quot;  They&#039;re figures used to convey our thoughts and feelings - especially feelings, because music is art and therefore communicates through the emotions.

I don&#039;t believe that songs should contradict the Scripture.  I&#039;m glad that Rodney specified in &quot;The Fourth Man&quot; that he was only &quot;creating an illustration.&quot;  A lot of people now-a-days aren&#039;t very well grounded in Biblical stories and doctrines, and they sure don&#039;t need to be confused further by their music.  I&#039;ve heard the Booth Brothers say that Mosie Lister (as I understood it) runs his songs by people in the ministry before letting them go.

Doctrines that are subversive of the Christian faith absolutely do not belong in our music.  I would include such things as denying the divinity of Christ, perhaps advocating praying to the saints, or any such thing.

On the whole, I&#039;m willing to take a song in the context of the rest of the author&#039;s work.  BF&amp;A sing &quot;The Father looked beyond the failures I had made; He &lt;b&gt;didn&#039;t notice&lt;/b&gt; all the times that I had not obeyed.&quot;  L5 sings &quot;When He sees I can&#039;t pay, He forgets the cost.&quot;  Not theologically true at all, but I understand what they mean, and I&#039;d never assume that they were denying the necessity of the Atonement.  They were making a specific point in those songs, and L5 also sings  &quot;Unless a Lamb was led to the slaughter, and up on the altar the Sacrifice laid; unless He saved the sons and the daughters with blood that flowed from  His own veins.&quot;

Sorry to make such a &lt;i&gt;long&lt;/i&gt; comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; that&#8217;s a very different question for me than for some of you.  I&#8217;m Arminian in doctrine, and a majority (probably) of SG artists are Baptist/Calvinistic.  So I&#8217;m used to putting up with doctrine that I don&#8217;t exactly agree with. <img src='http://www.southerngospelblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   (I&#8217;m not Pentecostal either, so there goes the other 40%!)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have any problem with songs like &#8220;Mama&#8217;s Teaching Angels&#8230;&#8221; It&#8217;s a pleasant imagination &#8230; and who knows? <img src='http://www.southerngospelblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />   What about &#8220;Serenaded by Angels&#8221;?  No chapter and verse for that one, either.  And the line in the Kingsmen/Ronnie Hinson song about &#8220;The angels spread their wings and stood prepared &#8230;&#8221;  They&#8217;re figures used to convey our thoughts and feelings &#8211; especially feelings, because music is art and therefore communicates through the emotions.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe that songs should contradict the Scripture.  I&#8217;m glad that Rodney specified in &#8220;The Fourth Man&#8221; that he was only &#8220;creating an illustration.&#8221;  A lot of people now-a-days aren&#8217;t very well grounded in Biblical stories and doctrines, and they sure don&#8217;t need to be confused further by their music.  I&#8217;ve heard the Booth Brothers say that Mosie Lister (as I understood it) runs his songs by people in the ministry before letting them go.</p>
<p>Doctrines that are subversive of the Christian faith absolutely do not belong in our music.  I would include such things as denying the divinity of Christ, perhaps advocating praying to the saints, or any such thing.</p>
<p>On the whole, I&#8217;m willing to take a song in the context of the rest of the author&#8217;s work.  BF&amp;A sing &#8220;The Father looked beyond the failures I had made; He <b>didn&#8217;t notice</b> all the times that I had not obeyed.&#8221;  L5 sings &#8220;When He sees I can&#8217;t pay, He forgets the cost.&#8221;  Not theologically true at all, but I understand what they mean, and I&#8217;d never assume that they were denying the necessity of the Atonement.  They were making a specific point in those songs, and L5 also sings  &#8220;Unless a Lamb was led to the slaughter, and up on the altar the Sacrifice laid; unless He saved the sons and the daughters with blood that flowed from  His own veins.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry to make such a <i>long</i> comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/933/comment-page-1#comment-13469</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=933#comment-13469</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s an interesting clip about lyrical content....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bd8M6f6X224</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting clip about lyrical content&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bd8M6f6X224" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bd8M6f6X224</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/933/comment-page-1#comment-13468</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=933#comment-13468</guid>
		<description>While agree that there should be some liberty and freedom in storytelling, there should be limits on that.  I mean, if we aren&#039;t going to write songs that are strong in doctrine, or accurate in telling the event as Scripture does, why write it? Better yet, why should I listen to it? There are cults that have great music.  One, in fact, has a world famous Choir that sings hymns, at least some hymns, that you and I grew up on.  I can assure you, they have as good of a chance being invited to our church as any Southern Gospel group or artist that sings songs that are not based on good, solid doctrine.  For me, the answer to the original question is, again, no.  I don&#039;t consider songwriters theologians. But, I do consider the theology of the song(s) when it comes to who I listen to, or who we invite to sing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While agree that there should be some liberty and freedom in storytelling, there should be limits on that.  I mean, if we aren&#8217;t going to write songs that are strong in doctrine, or accurate in telling the event as Scripture does, why write it? Better yet, why should I listen to it? There are cults that have great music.  One, in fact, has a world famous Choir that sings hymns, at least some hymns, that you and I grew up on.  I can assure you, they have as good of a chance being invited to our church as any Southern Gospel group or artist that sings songs that are not based on good, solid doctrine.  For me, the answer to the original question is, again, no.  I don&#8217;t consider songwriters theologians. But, I do consider the theology of the song(s) when it comes to who I listen to, or who we invite to sing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seaton</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/933/comment-page-1#comment-13464</link>
		<dc:creator>Seaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=933#comment-13464</guid>
		<description>If we were nit picky enough we could find an issue with just about any song.  I don&#039;t mind a bit of poetic license as long as the message in the song doesn&#039;t contradict or is totally out of line with scripture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we were nit picky enough we could find an issue with just about any song.  I don&#8217;t mind a bit of poetic license as long as the message in the song doesn&#8217;t contradict or is totally out of line with scripture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brady</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/933/comment-page-1#comment-13463</link>
		<dc:creator>brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=933#comment-13463</guid>
		<description>Well, if you listen to Rodney&#039;s lyric on &quot;My Name Is Lazarus,&quot; when he&#039;s describing the men who carried the bed of the crippled man, he says &quot;suppose&quot; that first man, second man, etc. This, to me, means he&#039;s saying, &quot;What if these other men carrying this lame man happened to be people Jesus had healed at one time or another...&quot;  He&#039;s not claiming it for Biblical fact. The word &quot;suppose&quot; offers it out there as a suggestion for you to think about &quot;what if it happened this way...&quot;

A Biblically correct lyric is the most important ingredient to a southern gospel song.  I cringe, like Andrew in Post #9, when songs are sung or played on the radio that are not of sound Biblical theology.  Songs like &quot;His Tomb Wasn&#039;t Empty (It Was Full Of My Sin)&quot; or &quot;Mama&#039;s Teaching Angels How To Sing.&quot; Those songs take a whole lot of poetic freedom--I doubt anyone could find chapter and verse for the basis for those songs.  But, perhaps because of who performed them or who wrote them, they continue to get played.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if you listen to Rodney&#8217;s lyric on &#8220;My Name Is Lazarus,&#8221; when he&#8217;s describing the men who carried the bed of the crippled man, he says &#8220;suppose&#8221; that first man, second man, etc. This, to me, means he&#8217;s saying, &#8220;What if these other men carrying this lame man happened to be people Jesus had healed at one time or another&#8230;&#8221;  He&#8217;s not claiming it for Biblical fact. The word &#8220;suppose&#8221; offers it out there as a suggestion for you to think about &#8220;what if it happened this way&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>A Biblically correct lyric is the most important ingredient to a southern gospel song.  I cringe, like Andrew in Post #9, when songs are sung or played on the radio that are not of sound Biblical theology.  Songs like &#8220;His Tomb Wasn&#8217;t Empty (It Was Full Of My Sin)&#8221; or &#8220;Mama&#8217;s Teaching Angels How To Sing.&#8221; Those songs take a whole lot of poetic freedom&#8211;I doubt anyone could find chapter and verse for the basis for those songs.  But, perhaps because of who performed them or who wrote them, they continue to get played.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seaton</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/933/comment-page-1#comment-13459</link>
		<dc:creator>Seaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=933#comment-13459</guid>
		<description>A few individuals mentioned Rodney Griffin.  Even Rodney uses poetic license to convey a message in song.  Greater Vision&#039;s most popular song &quot;My Name Is Lazarus&quot; took poetic license when it mentioned the four men carrying the bed of the cripple man.  There is no biblical account of who those four men actually were (especially one of them being Lazarus).  Should radio stations not play that song because it is not doctrinally sound.  No, it is a great song and if I remember correctly it even won Song of the Year.

Songwriters are story tellers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few individuals mentioned Rodney Griffin.  Even Rodney uses poetic license to convey a message in song.  Greater Vision&#8217;s most popular song &#8220;My Name Is Lazarus&#8221; took poetic license when it mentioned the four men carrying the bed of the cripple man.  There is no biblical account of who those four men actually were (especially one of them being Lazarus).  Should radio stations not play that song because it is not doctrinally sound.  No, it is a great song and if I remember correctly it even won Song of the Year.</p>
<p>Songwriters are story tellers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GospelMusicFan</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/933/comment-page-1#comment-13458</link>
		<dc:creator>GospelMusicFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=933#comment-13458</guid>
		<description>the last #7 should be #3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the last #7 should be #3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GospelMusicFan</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/933/comment-page-1#comment-13457</link>
		<dc:creator>GospelMusicFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=933#comment-13457</guid>
		<description>Thank you, DJPhil , for the clarification in reply #7 to my reply #7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, DJPhil , for the clarification in reply #7 to my reply #7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
