<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ask and Ye Shall Receive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/465/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/465</link>
	<description>Positive Daily Commentary on Southern Gospel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:31:23 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam Wallace</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/465/comment-page-1#comment-6230</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/465#comment-6230</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure why I went all the way back to this page but I was reading it and I have to say that I agree with you on your number one Daniel but I would have put one of the groups with Danny Funderburk closer to the top.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why I went all the way back to this page but I was reading it and I have to say that I agree with you on your number one Daniel but I would have put one of the groups with Danny Funderburk closer to the top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QN</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/465/comment-page-1#comment-5899</link>
		<dc:creator>QN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/465#comment-5899</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d put any combination with Danny Funderburk MUCH higher. Second to Tremble,Webster, and Cooley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d put any combination with Danny Funderburk MUCH higher. Second to Tremble,Webster, and Cooley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Mount</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/465/comment-page-1#comment-5870</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mount</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/465#comment-5870</guid>
		<description>Dean, I believe we cross-posted. I shall have to pay closer attention next time I listen through those albums!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dean, I believe we cross-posted. I shall have to pay closer attention next time I listen through those albums!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Mount</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/465/comment-page-1#comment-5869</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mount</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/465#comment-5869</guid>
		<description>I have to admit I&#039;m not as familiar with Horne&#039;s voice. I do have one or two albums he did with them, but since I&#039;m not as familiar with it I&#039;m not comfortable ranking it compared to the others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit I&#8217;m not as familiar with Horne&#8217;s voice. I do have one or two albums he did with them, but since I&#8217;m not as familiar with it I&#8217;m not comfortable ranking it compared to the others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Adkins</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/465/comment-page-1#comment-5868</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Adkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/465#comment-5868</guid>
		<description>Let me clarify my response above. I meant to add that although you considered the combination I mentioned as short-lived, I would still consider that combo as on of the better ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me clarify my response above. I meant to add that although you considered the combination I mentioned as short-lived, I would still consider that combo as on of the better ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Adkins</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/465/comment-page-1#comment-5867</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Adkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/465#comment-5867</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s one Cathedral line-up that you don&#039;t have listed that was one of their better combinations.

Roger Horne (tenor), Payne, Tremble, Cooley.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s one Cathedral line-up that you don&#8217;t have listed that was one of their better combinations.</p>
<p>Roger Horne (tenor), Payne, Tremble, Cooley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Mount</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/465/comment-page-1#comment-5826</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mount</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/465#comment-5826</guid>
		<description>John, I&#039;m glad you can sleep now!

I often refer to them as albums. I use projects virtually interchangeably. At least I don&#039;t refer to them all as CDs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, I&#8217;m glad you can sleep now!</p>
<p>I often refer to them as albums. I use projects virtually interchangeably. At least I don&#8217;t refer to them all as CDs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Butler</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/465/comment-page-1#comment-5821</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/465#comment-5821</guid>
		<description>Thanks for ranking the Tremble / Webster group so high. I loved their full sound when they moved from solo to full quartet. I would love to hear that right now!
JEB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for ranking the Tremble / Webster group so high. I loved their full sound when they moved from solo to full quartet. I would love to hear that right now!<br />
JEB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inquirer</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/465/comment-page-1#comment-5820</link>
		<dc:creator>Inquirer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/465#comment-5820</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Daniel, for obliging(notice I didn&#039;t use the non-word &quot;obligating&quot;&quot;-))...now I can sleep tonight!:-)

Now to get you to start referring to the recordings as &quot;albums&quot;(as they&#039;ve always been)instead of &quot;projects&quot;, the transformation will be complete! j/k(sort of)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Daniel, for obliging(notice I didn&#8217;t use the non-word &#8220;obligating&#8221;"-))&#8230;now I can sleep tonight!:-)</p>
<p>Now to get you to start referring to the recordings as &#8220;albums&#8221;(as they&#8217;ve always been)instead of &#8220;projects&#8221;, the transformation will be complete! j/k(sort of)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horvel</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/465/comment-page-1#comment-5814</link>
		<dc:creator>Horvel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/465#comment-5814</guid>
		<description>This is a testament to how differently two pairs of ears can hear things! If you flipped numbers 6 and 7, my list would duplicate yours, except in the reverse order. You&#039;re the aficionado on these Cats, so I&#039;d expect you could discuss at length how you arrived at your ranking, citing examples where necessary. I&#039;d definitely enjoy reading it. Good topic. I miss these guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a testament to how differently two pairs of ears can hear things! If you flipped numbers 6 and 7, my list would duplicate yours, except in the reverse order. You&#8217;re the aficionado on these Cats, so I&#8217;d expect you could discuss at length how you arrived at your ranking, citing examples where necessary. I&#8217;d definitely enjoy reading it. Good topic. I miss these guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
