<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hoppers sign with Mansion?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/4293/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/4293</link>
	<description>Positive Daily Commentary on Southern Gospel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:02:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triumphant signs with Mansion &#124; SouthernGospelBlog.com</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/4293#comment-36626</link>
		<dc:creator>Triumphant signs with Mansion &#124; SouthernGospelBlog.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=4293#comment-36626</guid>
		<description>[...] is headed by former Homeland Records executive Bill Traylor. The label also recently signed the Hoppers. With one of Southern Gospel&#8217;s most awarded family groups and the current [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is headed by former Homeland Records executive Bill Traylor. The label also recently signed the Hoppers. With one of Southern Gospel&#8217;s most awarded family groups and the current [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicky</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/4293#comment-34804</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=4293#comment-34804</guid>
		<description>I noticed that Spring Hill Music Group have re-released the Hoppers&#039; (as well as Kim Hopper&#039;s) old soundtracks from previous recordings. What&#039;s with that??? The SH website is under construction so I really couldn&#039;t dig anything up there. I thought SH was pretty much done with southern gospel, someone correct me if I&#039;m wrong. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed that Spring Hill Music Group have re-released the Hoppers&#8217; (as well as Kim Hopper&#8217;s) old soundtracks from previous recordings. What&#8217;s with that??? The SH website is under construction so I really couldn&#8217;t dig anything up there. I thought SH was pretty much done with southern gospel, someone correct me if I&#8217;m wrong. <img src='http://www.southerngospelblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel Sitler</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/4293#comment-33894</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Sitler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 01:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=4293#comment-33894</guid>
		<description>I found out that Riversong/Homeland/Heartwarming is back doing Southern Gospel again.  I wonder how long they&#039;ve been at that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found out that Riversong/Homeland/Heartwarming is back doing Southern Gospel again.  I wonder how long they&#8217;ve been at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Mount</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/4293#comment-33890</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mount</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=4293#comment-33890</guid>
		<description>It was just the economy. The imprint is still around, but I confirmed (and I think I posted) last NQC that they&#039;re only really re-issuing classics at this point.

I actually thought that my regular readers knew about that, but I guess that there was so much other news that week that it didn&#039;t really catch everyone&#039;s eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was just the economy. The imprint is still around, but I confirmed (and I think I posted) last NQC that they&#8217;re only really re-issuing classics at this point.</p>
<p>I actually thought that my regular readers knew about that, but I guess that there was so much other news that week that it didn&#8217;t really catch everyone&#8217;s eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brady</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/4293#comment-33885</link>
		<dc:creator>Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=4293#comment-33885</guid>
		<description>And of course I meant Daniel!  He and I aren&#039;t close enough for me to call him Danie.  LOL!   I&#039;m really batting a thousand on my typing skills today! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And of course I meant Daniel!  He and I aren&#8217;t close enough for me to call him Danie.  LOL!   I&#8217;m really batting a thousand on my typing skills today! <img src='http://www.southerngospelblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul the Concert Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/4293#comment-33881</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul the Concert Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=4293#comment-33881</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Brady, I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Brady, I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brady</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/4293#comment-33880</link>
		<dc:creator>Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=4293#comment-33880</guid>
		<description>LOL on my typo in the second long paragraph. It should read &quot;so chose&quot; and not &quot;soc hose.&quot;  I wouldn&#039;t want to be accused of speculating about Danie&#039;s stockings! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL on my typo in the second long paragraph. It should read &#8220;so chose&#8221; and not &#8220;soc hose.&#8221;  I wouldn&#8217;t want to be accused of speculating about Danie&#8217;s stockings! <img src='http://www.southerngospelblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brady</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/4293#comment-33879</link>
		<dc:creator>Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=4293#comment-33879</guid>
		<description>With all due respect, Dave, please chill.  

All of us have opinions and are human.  I believe it is ok for #2 to wonder why Canaan failed, and I see no problem in wondering out loud as to why. My post didn&#039;t hurt anyone and I did specifically clarify that it was just my own speculation.  At least I had the guts to say it was speculation instead of trying to pass it off as law and gospel.  Speculation doesn&#039;t have to be a bad idea or word.

As for calling Canaan, why not?  I don&#039;t see why it would hurt if Daniel or any other reputable reporter soc hose to call a public company to ask why they folded a division.  Canaan/Word operates to sell the public music and other items and has had no problem accepting the public&#039;s money, so I don&#039;t have a problem with the public wanting to know why the Canaan division is no longer there.

I know what you&#039;re trying to say about speculation and I appreciate that, but I don&#039;t think my post fits in that category. It would be one thing to try to publicly speculate an individual&#039;s private matters, but this is a company that has had no problem taking the buying public&#039;s money, and my thoughts weren&#039;t attacking anyone. Sorry if you feel differently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all due respect, Dave, please chill.  </p>
<p>All of us have opinions and are human.  I believe it is ok for #2 to wonder why Canaan failed, and I see no problem in wondering out loud as to why. My post didn&#8217;t hurt anyone and I did specifically clarify that it was just my own speculation.  At least I had the guts to say it was speculation instead of trying to pass it off as law and gospel.  Speculation doesn&#8217;t have to be a bad idea or word.</p>
<p>As for calling Canaan, why not?  I don&#8217;t see why it would hurt if Daniel or any other reputable reporter soc hose to call a public company to ask why they folded a division.  Canaan/Word operates to sell the public music and other items and has had no problem accepting the public&#8217;s money, so I don&#8217;t have a problem with the public wanting to know why the Canaan division is no longer there.</p>
<p>I know what you&#8217;re trying to say about speculation and I appreciate that, but I don&#8217;t think my post fits in that category. It would be one thing to try to publicly speculate an individual&#8217;s private matters, but this is a company that has had no problem taking the buying public&#8217;s money, and my thoughts weren&#8217;t attacking anyone. Sorry if you feel differently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoppers Sign With Mansion Entertainment &#171; Burke&#39;s Brainwork</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/4293#comment-33878</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoppers Sign With Mansion Entertainment &#171; Burke&#39;s Brainwork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=4293#comment-33878</guid>
		<description>[...] 3, 2010 by burkesbrainwork    According to this post at Daniel Mount&#8217;s blog, the Hoppers have signed a recording agreement with Mansion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 3, 2010 by burkesbrainwork    According to this post at Daniel Mount&#8217;s blog, the Hoppers have signed a recording agreement with Mansion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/4293#comment-33877</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=4293#comment-33877</guid>
		<description>Fellow Poster&#039;s
  In all respect, please leave the speculation on the cutting room floor. Business&#039; fail or close their doors for what ever reason. In this case it does not matter as one of gospel music&#039;s greatest groups continue to produce music. 
  We all love this music and the message. Why cloud it with suggestions or supposed facts with no base? 
  I hope that no one calls Canaan. Just have joy in the fact the Hoppers have a new label and apparently are not missing a beat in the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fellow Poster&#8217;s<br />
  In all respect, please leave the speculation on the cutting room floor. Business&#8217; fail or close their doors for what ever reason. In this case it does not matter as one of gospel music&#8217;s greatest groups continue to produce music.<br />
  We all love this music and the message. Why cloud it with suggestions or supposed facts with no base?<br />
  I hope that no one calls Canaan. Just have joy in the fact the Hoppers have a new label and apparently are not missing a beat in the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
