<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gene McDonald to appear at Florida Boys&#8217; farewell?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/426/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/426</link>
	<description>Positive Daily Commentary on Southern Gospel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:35:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Mount</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/426/comment-page-1#comment-5999</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mount</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 01:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/source/archives/426#comment-5999</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lashay</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/426/comment-page-1#comment-5998</link>
		<dc:creator>lashay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 01:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/source/archives/426#comment-5998</guid>
		<description>actually, I wrote that in a hurry and I didn&#039;t even realize the mistakes. and what I really meant was that Josh and Butch would rejoin the group at NQC....meaning that they&#039;d meet the rest of the guys there to make their final stand. sorry for the confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually, I wrote that in a hurry and I didn&#8217;t even realize the mistakes. and what I really meant was that Josh and Butch would rejoin the group at NQC&#8230;.meaning that they&#8217;d meet the rest of the guys there to make their final stand. sorry for the confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/426/comment-page-1#comment-5613</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 01:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/source/archives/426#comment-5613</guid>
		<description>whether Gene or Harold returns Owens and Garner are enough!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whether Gene or Harold returns Owens and Garner are enough!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bruce Murray</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/426/comment-page-1#comment-5387</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bruce Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 03:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/source/archives/426#comment-5387</guid>
		<description>Deciphering what a writer really meant to say can sometimes be confusing.

It seems pretty clear to me in this case, though, that the word &quot;both&quot; in the last quoted sentence refers to Gene and Harold. 

Why? Well, Owens and Garner wouldn&#039;t &quot;rejoin&quot; the group, since they&#039;ve never left the group.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deciphering what a writer really meant to say can sometimes be confusing.</p>
<p>It seems pretty clear to me in this case, though, that the word &#8220;both&#8221; in the last quoted sentence refers to Gene and Harold. </p>
<p>Why? Well, Owens and Garner wouldn&#8217;t &#8220;rejoin&#8221; the group, since they&#8217;ve never left the group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Mount</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/426/comment-page-1#comment-5368</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mount</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 12:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/source/archives/426#comment-5368</guid>
		<description>You have a good point. I will edit the post to reflect it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a good point. I will edit the post to reflect it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conner</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/426/comment-page-1#comment-5367</link>
		<dc:creator>Conner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 11:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/source/archives/426#comment-5367</guid>
		<description>It appears we may need some clarification from the author. I took &quot;both&quot; to mean the aforementioned Garner and Owens would rejoin the elder statesmen. Although I wouldn&#039;t count McDonald out, I don&#039;t think it was the author&#039;s intent to confirm it with this note. Notice how Bankston also mistakenly used the word &quot;respectfully&quot; when she really meant &quot;respectively,&quot; an easy error to make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears we may need some clarification from the author. I took &#8220;both&#8221; to mean the aforementioned Garner and Owens would rejoin the elder statesmen. Although I wouldn&#8217;t count McDonald out, I don&#8217;t think it was the author&#8217;s intent to confirm it with this note. Notice how Bankston also mistakenly used the word &#8220;respectfully&#8221; when she really meant &#8220;respectively,&#8221; an easy error to make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
