<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conservative Gospel Music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/366/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/366</link>
	<description>Positive Daily Commentary on Southern Gospel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:54:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Mount</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/366/comment-page-1#comment-4927</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mount</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 16:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/source/archives/366#comment-4927</guid>
		<description>Well, from my vantage point, I can have no problem seeing how someone could identify &quot;Conservative Gospel Music&quot; in a way that would include Steve Green&#039;s older music and current traditional SG, but would not include the Booth Brothers, Crossway, or TK and McRae.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, from my vantage point, I can have no problem seeing how someone could identify &#8220;Conservative Gospel Music&#8221; in a way that would include Steve Green&#8217;s older music and current traditional SG, but would not include the Booth Brothers, Crossway, or TK and McRae.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Unthank</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/366/comment-page-1#comment-4926</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Unthank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 16:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/source/archives/366#comment-4926</guid>
		<description>This reader that you mentioned likes Steve Green - who isn&#039;t even remotely southern.  In fact - progressive SG would fit INBETWEEN the work of Steve Green and Greater Vision.

Not to mention the fact that fans of pop and rock would consider progressive SG to be &quot;conservative gospel&quot; as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reader that you mentioned likes Steve Green &#8211; who isn&#8217;t even remotely southern.  In fact &#8211; progressive SG would fit INBETWEEN the work of Steve Green and Greater Vision.</p>
<p>Not to mention the fact that fans of pop and rock would consider progressive SG to be &#8220;conservative gospel&#8221; as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Cottrell</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/366/comment-page-1#comment-4925</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Cottrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 12:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/source/archives/366#comment-4925</guid>
		<description>Very well put.  I sometimes forget that Southern Gospel does not necessarily mean Conservative.  More often than not when I hear Progressive Southern Gospel, I am disappointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well put.  I sometimes forget that Southern Gospel does not necessarily mean Conservative.  More often than not when I hear Progressive Southern Gospel, I am disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
