New Design Launched
Well, the new design is live! There are a few tweaks yet to be worked out, but this is pretty much what I had in mind.
What do you think? Is this design a keeper? Done or not, am I heading in the right direction?
Positive Daily Commentary on Southern Gospel
Well, the new design is live! There are a few tweaks yet to be worked out, but this is pretty much what I had in mind.
What do you think? Is this design a keeper? Done or not, am I heading in the right direction?
© 2008 by Daniel J. Mount. Theme designed by MainCore and modified by DJM.
Comment by Donna (May 3, 2007, 7:18 am)
I really like the new design. I like being able to select from several categories and to see the newest posts in those categories. It’s not as graphically pleasing, but it is a lot more functional for me! Great job, Daniel.
Comment by Dean Adkins (May 3, 2007, 9:36 am)
I like the old format better.
Comment by drippy (May 3, 2007, 9:46 am)
The old design was more “blog-like.” I don’t mind an opening page, but I’d personally rather read your blog in traditional blog-post fashion.
Comment by David Bruce Murray (May 3, 2007, 10:18 am)
I like the older format better as well…with all the most recent blog posts on the same front page. This new design doesn’t work with my RSS feed reader any more, so now I have to check the site manually.
Comment by Bob Hughes (May 3, 2007, 11:26 am)
Daniel - please bring back the RSS feed when you get a chance. Thanks!
Comment by Chris Unthank (May 3, 2007, 1:10 pm)
Gotta admit - I liked the old design better as well!
Comment by Bob Hughes (May 3, 2007, 1:44 pm)
Never mind - I figured out the new URL for the RSS feed. David - change your RSS feed URL from http://www.southerngospelblog.com/feed/ to http://www.southerngospelblog.com/source/feed/
Comment by Paul Jackson (May 4, 2007, 3:52 am)
Looks great Daniel!
Easy to navigate…looks toward the future.
Change is the evidence of life.
Say with it.
PJ
Comment by J.Johnson (May 4, 2007, 10:14 am)
I prefer the older style myself, but don’t mind the new as long as I can still click to the old!
Comment by JimT (May 8, 2007, 1:36 am)
I agree with Avery. Old site was much better.