<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canaan Records Returning?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/338/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/338</link>
	<description>Positive Daily Commentary on Southern Gospel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:51:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/338/comment-page-1#comment-3835</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/338#comment-3835</guid>
		<description>When I first read Deon&#039;s comment, I thought he was being serious!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first read Deon&#8217;s comment, I thought he was being serious!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/338/comment-page-1#comment-3834</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/338#comment-3834</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Mount</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/338/comment-page-1#comment-3828</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mount</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/338#comment-3828</guid>
		<description>Phil - I hope so! I also hope they&#039;d make them available as digital downloads.

GospelHog - I&#039;ve heard about him. I&#039;m too much of a newcomer to remember him personally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil &#8211; I hope so! I also hope they&#8217;d make them available as digital downloads.</p>
<p>GospelHog &#8211; I&#8217;ve heard about him. I&#8217;m too much of a newcomer to remember him personally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GospelHog</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/338/comment-page-1#comment-3827</link>
		<dc:creator>GospelHog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/338#comment-3827</guid>
		<description>Does anyone remember Marvin Norcross?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone remember Marvin Norcross?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/338/comment-page-1#comment-3818</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/338#comment-3818</guid>
		<description>I am curious as to if they still own the masters to the old Canaan projects and would release them on CDs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am curious as to if they still own the masters to the old Canaan projects and would release them on CDs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deon Unthank</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/338/comment-page-1#comment-3808</link>
		<dc:creator>Deon Unthank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 03:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/338#comment-3808</guid>
		<description>Hey, John, I say that Canaan Records was &quot;one&quot; of the premier labels back then. With groups like the Happy Goodmans, the Florida Boys, the Couriers, the Harvesters, the LeFevres, and yes even the Tall Men Quartet, they were at least on par with Skylite, Sing, and HeartWarming Records.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, John, I say that Canaan Records was &#8220;one&#8221; of the premier labels back then. With groups like the Happy Goodmans, the Florida Boys, the Couriers, the Harvesters, the LeFevres, and yes even the Tall Men Quartet, they were at least on par with Skylite, Sing, and HeartWarming Records.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Mount</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/338/comment-page-1#comment-3781</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mount</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 13:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/338#comment-3781</guid>
		<description>Okay. Thanks for the clarification! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay. Thanks for the clarification! <img src='http://www.southerngospelblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/338/comment-page-1#comment-3780</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/338#comment-3780</guid>
		<description>Thanks Daniel for your nice words.

Oh!  Were the Oak Ridge Boys REALLY the Oak Ridge Boys when Hamill was in the group?  LOL!  Sorry.  Just a little sarcastic comment there. . . 
  
You are correct that the Oak Ridge Boys &quot;Together With the Harvesters&quot; was released on the Canaan label.  It&#039;s a nice album.  However, like several of the earliest Canaan albums, this is a reissued project first released on Arthur Smith&#039;s Festival label.  It was reissued when the Harvesters Quartet moved to Canaan for their final two albums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Daniel for your nice words.</p>
<p>Oh!  Were the Oak Ridge Boys REALLY the Oak Ridge Boys when Hamill was in the group?  LOL!  Sorry.  Just a little sarcastic comment there. . . </p>
<p>You are correct that the Oak Ridge Boys &#8220;Together With the Harvesters&#8221; was released on the Canaan label.  It&#8217;s a nice album.  However, like several of the earliest Canaan albums, this is a reissued project first released on Arthur Smith&#8217;s Festival label.  It was reissued when the Harvesters Quartet moved to Canaan for their final two albums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Mount</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/338/comment-page-1#comment-3776</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mount</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/338#comment-3776</guid>
		<description>John, I love it when you stop by and comment! It&#039;s always a unique and informative perspective.

Incidentally--and I only bring this up since you&#039;re the master of SG trivia--the Oak Ridge Boys do have an entry in the Canaan Discography, if I&#039;m not mistaken - Together With the Harvesters (CAS-9625).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, I love it when you stop by and comment! It&#8217;s always a unique and informative perspective.</p>
<p>Incidentally&#8211;and I only bring this up since you&#8217;re the master of SG trivia&#8211;the Oak Ridge Boys do have an entry in the Canaan Discography, if I&#8217;m not mistaken &#8211; Together With the Harvesters (CAS-9625).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/338/comment-page-1#comment-3765</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 05:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/338#comment-3765</guid>
		<description>You wrote:
&quot;Of course, in the old days, it was Southern Gospel’s premier label, featuring names like the Cathedrals, the Florida Boys, the Happy Goodmans, the Kingsmen, the Inspirations, and pretty nearly anybody who was anybody.&quot;

So I suppose the stable of artists from Skylite and Heart Warming were chopped liver?  Let&#039;s see. . . that would include the Speer Family, Oak Ridge Boys, Imperials, Blackwood Brothers, Rambos, Downings, Statesmen (although they did have one CD on Canaan in the 90s), Gaithers, JD &amp; the Stamps, Masters V, and perhaps the best two albums ever released by your beloved Cathedrals.

If I were placing artists on a scale, I&#039;d say that &quot;pretty nearly anybody that was anybody&quot; weren&#039;t necessarily recording on the Canaan label.  

Did they have a good group of artists?  Yes.  &quot;Southern gospel&#039;s premier label in the old days&quot;?  Nope.  I just don&#039;t buy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wrote:<br />
&#8220;Of course, in the old days, it was Southern Gospel’s premier label, featuring names like the Cathedrals, the Florida Boys, the Happy Goodmans, the Kingsmen, the Inspirations, and pretty nearly anybody who was anybody.&#8221;</p>
<p>So I suppose the stable of artists from Skylite and Heart Warming were chopped liver?  Let&#8217;s see. . . that would include the Speer Family, Oak Ridge Boys, Imperials, Blackwood Brothers, Rambos, Downings, Statesmen (although they did have one CD on Canaan in the 90s), Gaithers, JD &amp; the Stamps, Masters V, and perhaps the best two albums ever released by your beloved Cathedrals.</p>
<p>If I were placing artists on a scale, I&#8217;d say that &#8220;pretty nearly anybody that was anybody&#8221; weren&#8217;t necessarily recording on the Canaan label.  </p>
<p>Did they have a good group of artists?  Yes.  &#8220;Southern gospel&#8217;s premier label in the old days&#8221;?  Nope.  I just don&#8217;t buy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
