<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What makes a quartet&#8217;s arrangements traditional?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/250/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/250</link>
	<description>Positive Daily Commentary on Southern Gospel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:31:23 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mary St.Clair</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/250/comment-page-1#comment-3138</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary St.Clair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 17:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/250#comment-3138</guid>
		<description>For a quartet, the piano and voices as the focus, with other instruments as backup, is a MUST the way I look at it. 
 Sure, other types of arrangments are sometimes appropriate for trios, ect...  But when a quartet starts to cover up the piano with screaming electric guirars, orchestra, or whatever else fits their fancy, it is usually bad. For example, &quot;Do You Want To Be Forgiven&quot;, or &quot;Jesus My Lord&quot; (  A well known studio musician wrote it, and one can tell by listening)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a quartet, the piano and voices as the focus, with other instruments as backup, is a MUST the way I look at it.<br />
 Sure, other types of arrangments are sometimes appropriate for trios, ect&#8230;  But when a quartet starts to cover up the piano with screaming electric guirars, orchestra, or whatever else fits their fancy, it is usually bad. For example, &#8220;Do You Want To Be Forgiven&#8221;, or &#8220;Jesus My Lord&#8221; (  A well known studio musician wrote it, and one can tell by listening)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LSJ</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/250/comment-page-1#comment-1635</link>
		<dc:creator>LSJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/250#comment-1635</guid>
		<description>My above post of Tenor-Lead-Bass-Baritone was for Barbershop Quartets.  Then, I mentioned that otherwise (which should have clearly been stated that the other order Tenor-Lead-Baritone-Bass) is the way SoGospel quartets have lined up since the early days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My above post of Tenor-Lead-Bass-Baritone was for Barbershop Quartets.  Then, I mentioned that otherwise (which should have clearly been stated that the other order Tenor-Lead-Baritone-Bass) is the way SoGospel quartets have lined up since the early days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inquirer</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/250/comment-page-1#comment-1621</link>
		<dc:creator>Inquirer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 17:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/250#comment-1621</guid>
		<description>To those who have been trying to be helpful on the subject of how quartets line up on stage...may I point out that it is(from L-R)Tenor, Lead, Baritone, Bass...NOT Tenor, Lead, Bass, Baritone.

Some quartets may have lined up that latter way for some reason, and some may even do so now...but most all quartets have lined up in the former manner for as long as I&#039;ve been familiar with them, anyway.:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To those who have been trying to be helpful on the subject of how quartets line up on stage&#8230;may I point out that it is(from L-R)Tenor, Lead, Baritone, Bass&#8230;NOT Tenor, Lead, Bass, Baritone.</p>
<p>Some quartets may have lined up that latter way for some reason, and some may even do so now&#8230;but most all quartets have lined up in the former manner for as long as I&#8217;ve been familiar with them, anyway.:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LSJ</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/250/comment-page-1#comment-1559</link>
		<dc:creator>LSJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/250#comment-1559</guid>
		<description>Jugglernaut: Actually, in barbershop, the order is traditionally in the line of (from House L to R) Tenor, Lead, Bass, Baritone.  Otherwise, the traditional lineup for SoGo that tends to be (from House L to R) usu. high to low I believe goes back to the early days, where they only had one mic (or you can see pictures of the Statesmen, where they have 2 mics, tenor and lead on the left mic, and baritone and bass on the right).  I think this may have had more to do with having a way for the voices closer to the same frequency to be broadcast on the same mics.  (Not totally sure, but I know I&#039;ve read that somewhere.  Sorry for the unciteable references.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jugglernaut: Actually, in barbershop, the order is traditionally in the line of (from House L to R) Tenor, Lead, Bass, Baritone.  Otherwise, the traditional lineup for SoGo that tends to be (from House L to R) usu. high to low I believe goes back to the early days, where they only had one mic (or you can see pictures of the Statesmen, where they have 2 mics, tenor and lead on the left mic, and baritone and bass on the right).  I think this may have had more to do with having a way for the voices closer to the same frequency to be broadcast on the same mics.  (Not totally sure, but I know I&#8217;ve read that somewhere.  Sorry for the unciteable references.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Unthank</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/250/comment-page-1#comment-1557</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Unthank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 04:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/250#comment-1557</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it always boggles my mind to see people call EHSSQ a progressive group.  Stylistically, other than a few key songs (much like GC), they are traditional to the core.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it always boggles my mind to see people call EHSSQ a progressive group.  Stylistically, other than a few key songs (much like GC), they are traditional to the core.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bruce Murray</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/250/comment-page-1#comment-1555</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bruce Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 04:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/250#comment-1555</guid>
		<description>EH&amp;SS come out singing &quot;Someday,&quot; written by Joe Moscheo, throw in some Gaither classics, some patriotic songs, and a slightly dressed up version of &quot;Get Away, Jordan.&quot; How could that be anything other than traditional? Lari GOSS orchestrates all of their stuff. 

They are one of the most traditional SOUNDING groups on the market right now. 

Their gimmick is that they don&#039;t have traditional haircuts. That&#039;s it! They still wear suits...they work the stage like the Statesmen used to do...everything else they do is rooted in SG tradition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EH&amp;SS come out singing &#8220;Someday,&#8221; written by Joe Moscheo, throw in some Gaither classics, some patriotic songs, and a slightly dressed up version of &#8220;Get Away, Jordan.&#8221; How could that be anything other than traditional? Lari GOSS orchestrates all of their stuff. </p>
<p>They are one of the most traditional SOUNDING groups on the market right now. </p>
<p>Their gimmick is that they don&#8217;t have traditional haircuts. That&#8217;s it! They still wear suits&#8230;they work the stage like the Statesmen used to do&#8230;everything else they do is rooted in SG tradition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Fleshman</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/250/comment-page-1#comment-1552</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Fleshman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 23:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/250#comment-1552</guid>
		<description>GMF:

EHSSQ is traditional today, with a nod toward the Statesmen and a big thank you to the Cathederals.  They&#039;re just a little more energetic about it all.  A typical concert has tight harmony, old songs, new songs, a funny bit with the piano player and some synchronized movements.  For a refresher, check out the Statesmen&#039;s old tape of &quot;The Old Landmark.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GMF:</p>
<p>EHSSQ is traditional today, with a nod toward the Statesmen and a big thank you to the Cathederals.  They&#8217;re just a little more energetic about it all.  A typical concert has tight harmony, old songs, new songs, a funny bit with the piano player and some synchronized movements.  For a refresher, check out the Statesmen&#8217;s old tape of &#8220;The Old Landmark.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GospelMusicFan</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/250/comment-page-1#comment-1548</link>
		<dc:creator>GospelMusicFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 21:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/250#comment-1548</guid>
		<description>So that means Ernie Haase &amp; Signature Sound will be seen as traditional come 20 or 30 years from now. 
They are ahead of everyone else in the evolving process of southern gospel music right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So that means Ernie Haase &amp; Signature Sound will be seen as traditional come 20 or 30 years from now.<br />
They are ahead of everyone else in the evolving process of southern gospel music right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Unthank</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/250/comment-page-1#comment-1540</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Unthank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 17:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/250#comment-1540</guid>
		<description>I guess my main gripe Daniel is that your definition is too narrow.  I believe your definition for traditional SG would have fit 20 years ago - but like music always does - the face of traditional SG has changed and evolved into something more.  Now, traditional includes huge orchestrations without a piano accompaniment with traditional vocal arrangements.  So yes, while Revival by Gold City does have some more country and progressive moments - at it&#039;s core - it is still a traditional recording.  The same can be said of Brian Free &amp; Assurance and Mercy Mark&#039;s latest.

Question - how would you define the last two recordings from the Dove Brothers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess my main gripe Daniel is that your definition is too narrow.  I believe your definition for traditional SG would have fit 20 years ago &#8211; but like music always does &#8211; the face of traditional SG has changed and evolved into something more.  Now, traditional includes huge orchestrations without a piano accompaniment with traditional vocal arrangements.  So yes, while Revival by Gold City does have some more country and progressive moments &#8211; at it&#8217;s core &#8211; it is still a traditional recording.  The same can be said of Brian Free &amp; Assurance and Mercy Mark&#8217;s latest.</p>
<p>Question &#8211; how would you define the last two recordings from the Dove Brothers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/250/comment-page-1#comment-1538</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 17:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/250#comment-1538</guid>
		<description>I always wondered why the Cathedrals DIDN&#039;T line up that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always wondered why the Cathedrals DIDN&#8217;T line up that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
