<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Singing News Fan Awards revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/244/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/244</link>
	<description>Positive Daily Commentary on Southern Gospel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:04:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gladys Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/244/comment-page-1#comment-1415</link>
		<dc:creator>Gladys Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 00:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/244#comment-1415</guid>
		<description>I agree with you 100%, Daniel.  For whatever reasons, Singing News does not care about the opinion of their readers. They took away the &quot;important awards&quot;.  For what reason, we&#039;ll never know.  I also emailed them my thoughts.

Daniel, thanks so much for all your great topics.  I am so happy you did the interview with Ernie.  It was great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you 100%, Daniel.  For whatever reasons, Singing News does not care about the opinion of their readers. They took away the &#8220;important awards&#8221;.  For what reason, we&#8217;ll never know.  I also emailed them my thoughts.</p>
<p>Daniel, thanks so much for all your great topics.  I am so happy you did the interview with Ernie.  It was great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim T</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/244/comment-page-1#comment-1381</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 12:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/244#comment-1381</guid>
		<description>I also emailed SN, but they won&#039;t be confused with facts.  They claim the artists support the decision, which I find hard to believe, and anyway, isn&#039;t it the &quot;fan&quot; awards?  One of the main reasons I go to NQC is this program, and with it essentially being killed I am certain there will be a negative effect on their already sinking attendance.  I realize NQC and SN are seprate organizations, but NQC could apply some pressure.  Every fan should contact SN about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also emailed SN, but they won&#8217;t be confused with facts.  They claim the artists support the decision, which I find hard to believe, and anyway, isn&#8217;t it the &#8220;fan&#8221; awards?  One of the main reasons I go to NQC is this program, and with it essentially being killed I am certain there will be a negative effect on their already sinking attendance.  I realize NQC and SN are seprate organizations, but NQC could apply some pressure.  Every fan should contact SN about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint Abbott</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/244/comment-page-1#comment-1349</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint Abbott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/244#comment-1349</guid>
		<description>I agree that eliminating several of the awards stinks and I e-mailed Singing News and told them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that eliminating several of the awards stinks and I e-mailed Singing News and told them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LSJ</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/244/comment-page-1#comment-1347</link>
		<dc:creator>LSJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/244#comment-1347</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know.  It seems the sports analogy might be better applied to the whole of music rather than just one genre.    Just like we have basketball, football, baseball, hockey, soccer, and bowling, we have Rock, Country, Heavy Metal, Gospel, Contemporary Christian, and Southern Gospel (irrespectively).  So, with that view of the analogy, it seems silly having an award for just best &quot;sport&quot;, just as it would having an award for best &quot;music genre&quot;.

Perhaps a better analogy might be applied to Hollywood (etal) award shows (especially since my limited understanding and appreciation of sports requires me to seek another analogy): instead of having best actor, supporting actor, character actor, voice-over (Don LaFontaine, by the way), and animated character, we just choose best &quot;person to make an appearance in any way in a film&quot;.

I, too, am disappointed in the decision to limit the categories, but it will be interesting to see for whom people vote.  All the quartet-lovers will vote for their favorite quartet; those who follow one group around all the time (as I know some fans to do--they see every possible concert their favorite artist does) will vote for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know.  It seems the sports analogy might be better applied to the whole of music rather than just one genre.    Just like we have basketball, football, baseball, hockey, soccer, and bowling, we have Rock, Country, Heavy Metal, Gospel, Contemporary Christian, and Southern Gospel (irrespectively).  So, with that view of the analogy, it seems silly having an award for just best &#8220;sport&#8221;, just as it would having an award for best &#8220;music genre&#8221;.</p>
<p>Perhaps a better analogy might be applied to Hollywood (etal) award shows (especially since my limited understanding and appreciation of sports requires me to seek another analogy): instead of having best actor, supporting actor, character actor, voice-over (Don LaFontaine, by the way), and animated character, we just choose best &#8220;person to make an appearance in any way in a film&#8221;.</p>
<p>I, too, am disappointed in the decision to limit the categories, but it will be interesting to see for whom people vote.  All the quartet-lovers will vote for their favorite quartet; those who follow one group around all the time (as I know some fans to do&#8211;they see every possible concert their favorite artist does) will vote for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bunny</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/244/comment-page-1#comment-1346</link>
		<dc:creator>Bunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/244#comment-1346</guid>
		<description>I totally agree.  I was looking forward to voting for the first time for my favorite singers and now that&#039;s been taken away from me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree.  I was looking forward to voting for the first time for my favorite singers and now that&#8217;s been taken away from me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/244/comment-page-1#comment-1345</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/244#comment-1345</guid>
		<description>Amen, brother!!!  I am 100% with you on this one.  It&#039;s really a shame how they&#039;ve chosen to reduce the number of categories.  I&#039;m really disappointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen, brother!!!  I am 100% with you on this one.  It&#8217;s really a shame how they&#8217;ve chosen to reduce the number of categories.  I&#8217;m really disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
