<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Triumphant Quartet now a certified American Gospel Music artist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/233/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/233</link>
	<description>Positive Daily Commentary on Southern Gospel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:35:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/233/comment-page-1#comment-1202</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/233#comment-1202</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a way for a few people to make a quick buck...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a way for a few people to make a quick buck&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seaton</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/233/comment-page-1#comment-1195</link>
		<dc:creator>Seaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/233#comment-1195</guid>
		<description>Let me add one more thing about the whole AGM idea.  For me it sounds like a way for Southern Gospel artists to present Southern Gospel music on a larger scale.  Is this the way to increase the market for Southern Gospel music and it&#039;s artists.  I hope so.  Again, only time will tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me add one more thing about the whole AGM idea.  For me it sounds like a way for Southern Gospel artists to present Southern Gospel music on a larger scale.  Is this the way to increase the market for Southern Gospel music and it&#8217;s artists.  I hope so.  Again, only time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seaton</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/233/comment-page-1#comment-1193</link>
		<dc:creator>Seaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/233#comment-1193</guid>
		<description>It now includes both Triumphant and the Hoppers.  Two class acts in my opinion.  It can&#039;t be all that bad.  Time will tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It now includes both Triumphant and the Hoppers.  Two class acts in my opinion.  It can&#8217;t be all that bad.  Time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/233/comment-page-1#comment-1188</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/233#comment-1188</guid>
		<description>Very interesting.  Triumphant is among my favorite groups so they didn&#039;t need &quot;certification&quot; as far as I&#039;m concerned!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting.  Triumphant is among my favorite groups so they didn&#8217;t need &#8220;certification&#8221; as far as I&#8217;m concerned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Unthank</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/233/comment-page-1#comment-1184</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Unthank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 04:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/233#comment-1184</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure industry insiders are seriously considering it.  Some are - but based on what I could see at NQC - most industry insiders were very skeptical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure industry insiders are seriously considering it.  Some are &#8211; but based on what I could see at NQC &#8211; most industry insiders were very skeptical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
