<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CD/DVD Review: Live in Pigeon Forge (Old Paths)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/1155/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/1155</link>
	<description>Positive Daily Commentary on Southern Gospel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:04:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Mount</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/1155/comment-page-1#comment-16472</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mount</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=1155#comment-16472</guid>
		<description>Thanks!

Aaron, I think Brandon was only in his early to mid 20s, so 18 isn&#039;t that much younger. ;) 

Thanks for catching my typo on Matt Clark&#039;s name. I&#039;ll go back and edit that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>Aaron, I think Brandon was only in his early to mid 20s, so 18 isn&#8217;t that much younger. <img src='http://www.southerngospelblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Thanks for catching my typo on Matt Clark&#8217;s name. I&#8217;ll go back and edit that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Swain</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/1155/comment-page-1#comment-16471</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Swain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=1155#comment-16471</guid>
		<description>Daniel is correct. The guy&#039;s name is Trent Adams, and he is much younger; he&#039;s barely 18.

Also, Daniel, the featured pianist on this recording is Matt Clark, not Mike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel is correct. The guy&#8217;s name is Trent Adams, and he is much younger; he&#8217;s barely 18.</p>
<p>Also, Daniel, the featured pianist on this recording is Matt Clark, not Mike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Mount</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/1155/comment-page-1#comment-16465</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mount</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=1155#comment-16465</guid>
		<description>Yes, they got an even younger bass singer, the guy from Hope&#039;s Journey (Trent Adams?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, they got an even younger bass singer, the guy from Hope&#8217;s Journey (Trent Adams?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/1155/comment-page-1#comment-16464</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=1155#comment-16464</guid>
		<description>You really should see them in a normal concert.  They are really good.  In fact, it has amazed me that they haven&#039;t received more attention.  

Have they filled their bass spot yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really should see them in a normal concert.  They are really good.  In fact, it has amazed me that they haven&#8217;t received more attention.  </p>
<p>Have they filled their bass spot yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Mount</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/1155/comment-page-1#comment-16462</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mount</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=1155#comment-16462</guid>
		<description>G5, flourish to A5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G5, flourish to A5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natesings</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/1155/comment-page-1#comment-16461</link>
		<dc:creator>natesings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=1155#comment-16461</guid>
		<description>What was the note that Jay Parrack used to hit in &quot;When He Calls Me I&#039;ll Fly Away,&quot; any idea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was the note that Jay Parrack used to hit in &#8220;When He Calls Me I&#8217;ll Fly Away,&#8221; any idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Mount</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/1155/comment-page-1#comment-16460</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mount</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=1155#comment-16460</guid>
		<description>Yes. I could have just said C6, but &quot;double high C&quot; seems to be the informal SG way of referring to that note. It&#039;s somewhat like we call C1 &quot;double low C&quot; for bass singers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. I could have just said C6, but &#8220;double high C&#8221; seems to be the informal SG way of referring to that note. It&#8217;s somewhat like we call C1 &#8220;double low C&#8221; for bass singers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.C. Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/1155/comment-page-1#comment-16459</link>
		<dc:creator>J.C. Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=1155#comment-16459</guid>
		<description>Stupid question..........  The double high C is where in relation to Middle C??  Is it two octaves above middle C?  I know that is a silly question but just wanted to make sure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stupid question&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.  The double high C is where in relation to Middle C??  Is it two octaves above middle C?  I know that is a silly question but just wanted to make sure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Mount</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/1155/comment-page-1#comment-16458</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mount</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=1155#comment-16458</guid>
		<description>On second thought, I decided to go with the higher rating (the rating for the CD). Why not? :) 

I just edited the post and revised that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On second thought, I decided to go with the higher rating (the rating for the CD). Why not? <img src='http://www.southerngospelblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I just edited the post and revised that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Mount</title>
		<link>http://www.southerngospelblog.com/archives/1155/comment-page-1#comment-16456</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mount</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southerngospelblog.com/?p=1155#comment-16456</guid>
		<description>If I was rating the concert as a concert, it would get at least 4.5 of 5 stars, and maybe 5. The CD would probably get 4.5. I rated it at 4 because of the video element. What was there was good, no question, but with only two cameras (I think) - at any rate, no roving camera - you can only capture so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I was rating the concert as a concert, it would get at least 4.5 of 5 stars, and maybe 5. The CD would probably get 4.5. I rated it at 4 because of the video element. What was there was good, no question, but with only two cameras (I think) &#8211; at any rate, no roving camera &#8211; you can only capture so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
